Livestock Research for Rural Development 23 (6) 2011 Notes to Authors LRRD Newsletter

Citation of this paper

Differences in prevalence of trypanosomosis in Nkedi Zebu, Ankole and crossbred cattle under tethering and open grazing management systems in Uganda

J W Magona, J Walubengo and J T Odimim*

National Livestock Resources Research Institute, P.O. Box 96, Tororo, Uganda.
magona.joseph@gmail.com
* Department of Livestock Health and Entomology, P.O. Box 531, Entebbe, Uganda.

Abstract

Grazing systems and breed composition are increasingly changing with livestock developments taking place in tsetse-infested areas of Eastern Uganda. A cross-sectional study was therefore conducted in Soroti and Bugiri districts from June to August 2009 to assess the prevalence of trypanosome infections in Nkedi Zebu, Ankole and Friesian/Zebu crosses (Crosses) kept under tethering and open grazing systems. A total of 2362 cattle were bled and examined for trypanosome infections using both the Haematocrit centrifugation technique (HCT) and Buffy coat technique (BCT).

The findings revealed that cattle kept under open grazing (n = 1612) had a lower mean packed cell volume (PCV) (28.6% 95% CI 28.4-28.6) and a higher prevalence of trypanosome infection (7.3%) than those kept under tethering (n = 451): mean PCV-30.2% (95% CI 29.7-30.7) and prevalence-6.7%. Overall, Nkedi Zebu had the highest prevalence (7.2%), followed by Ankole (7%) and Crosses (0%). There was no difference between the mean PCV of Nkedi Zebu (29.0% 95% CI 28.8-29.2) and Ankole (28.8% 95% CI 28.0-29.6), which were higher than that of Crosses (27.7% 95% CI 24.5-30.8). Trypanosoma vivax was the dominant species (62%), followed by T. congolense (20%), mixed trypanosome infection (14%) and T. brucei (4%).

In conclusion, tsetse and trypanosomosis strategies in Uganda that rely on tsetse control by use of tsetse trapping or insecticide treatment of livestock integrated with chemotherapy, could be improved by making them breed and grazing system focused.

Keywords: Prevalence, trypanosomosis


Introduction

The Zebu type, to which the Nkedi Zebu breed belongs, and Sanga type, to which Ankole breed belongs, constitute over 95% of the cattle population in Uganda, while exotic or crossbred cattle constitute only 5% (Magona and Mayende, 2002). Cattle are predominantly kept under open grazing management-different herds grazing extensively on communal pastures, while some are kept under tethering grazing management-individual animals tied by ropes against pegs on pastures neighbouring homesteads (Magona et al 2000). Variation in the prevalence of trypanosomosis is known to depend on breed and intensity of management, among other factors (Kalu 1995; Hendrickx et al 2000). The recent restocking programme in Eastern Uganda in which Ankole, Friesian or Friesian/Zebu crossbred cattle were distributed to farmers in tsetse-infested areas led to changes in breed composition. Moreover, increasing human population pressure on land has led to reduction in availability of grazing land, thus affecting the farmers’ choice of the grazing system. As much as the entire Eastern region of Uganda is dominantly infested with Glossina f. fuscipes and to a limited extent G. pallidipes (Lancien et al 1990; Okoth et al 1991; Magona et al 1997; Okuna et al 999: Magona et al 2005) that transmit bovine trypanosomosis, the current changes in breed composition and proportions of cattle under tethering and open grazing systems undoubtedly influence the prevalence and distribution of bovine trypanosomosis. Effective control of tsetse and trypanosomosis needs consideration of breed and grazing system, yet little is known about the distribution of trypanosomosis according to cattle breeds and grazing systems in Eastern Uganda. This study was therefore carried out in selected districts to address this issue.

Materials and Methods

Study areas

The location of Soroti and Bugiri districts is shown on the Map (Fig. 1). Savannah grassland is the main vegetation in the two districts. The annual rainfall ranges from 1200 to 1500 mm and is distributed in a bimodal nature. There are two wet seasons (March to May and September to November) and two dry seasons (December to February and June to August). The daily mean minimum temperature is 15ºC and mean maximum is 27ºC. Small seasonal variations occur in rainfall and temperature between the districts (Ford and Katondo 1976).

Grazing systems

The cattle sampled were kept under two distinct grazing management systems, including open grazing (extensive) and tethering (semi-intensive) system. Under the open grazing or extensive system, cattle were herded freely on communal pastures intermixed with tsetse-infested bushes, often allowing many different herds to intermingle. Of particular interest under this grazing system, is the high cattle-tsetse contact.   

Figure 1: Map of Uganda showing Soroti and Bugiri districts where the study was conducted

Under the tethering or semi-intensive system, individual cattle are exclusively tethered on pastures near homesteads using ropes. Exposure to tsetse depended on whether pastures were near tsetse-infested bushes or not and hence the cattle-tsetse contact was variable. Despite grazing cattle in tsetse-infested pastures, all farmers visited did not practise any tsetse control interventions at all.

Sampling of cattle

Using grids produced in a Geographical Information System (GIS), 10 and 15 equidistant geo-referenced points, that covered Bugiri and Soroti districts, respectively, were determined. Ground truthing of each point was carried out using a Global-Positioning System (GPS) and villages in which the points fell were selected for sampling of cattle.  Mobilization of cattle owners to bring their animals for sampling, the sampling method undertaken to select 100 cattle per point and blood collection have been previously described elsewhere (Magona et al., 2004b). Cattle of all ages and gender were sampled without any discrimination. Additional data regarding age, gender, breed, grazing system, packed cell volume, owner, village and sub-county were collected for each animal.

Blood examination

Each blood sample was examined for trypanosome infection using both the Haematocrit centrifugation technique (Woo 1969) and the Buffy coat technique (Murray et al. 1977) and used to determine the PCV on Haematocrit reader (Hawksley, Lancing, UK).  Trypanosome species identification was based on morphological differentiation on Giemsa-stained thin films.

Data analysis

Of the 2362 examined for trypanosomosis, only 2063 had full data entries. The prevalences of trypanosome infection and mean PCV were compared, according to breed and grazing system using c2 or Mann-Whitney U-test, performed using the Minitab software package (Minitab, State College, PA). A P-value of <0.05 was considered a significant difference. 

Results

Nkedi Zebu was the dominant breed constituting 94.5%, followed by Ankole (4.8%) and Crosses (0.7%). The majority of the cattle (78.1%) were kept under open grazing and few under tethering (21.9%).

 

The prevalence of trypanosome infections in cattle from the 10 and 15 equidistant geo-referenced villages in Bugiri and Soroti districts are shown in Table 1 and 2, respectively. In Bugiri, the prevalence ranged from 1-28% while in Soroti district it ranged from 0-12%. In addition, the prevalence of trypanosome infections under open grazing and tethering systems are shown in Figure 2. The overall prevalence of trypanosome infection in cattle under open grazing (7.3%) was higher than that of those under tethering (6.7%), but not significantly so (c2 = 0.19, d.f. = 1, P = 0.65).  Cattle under open grazing had a significantly (P< 0.05) lower mean PCV (28.6%) than those under tethering (30.2%).


Table 1: Prevalence of trypanosome infections in cattle sampled at the 10 equidistant geo-referenced villages in Bugiri district, 2009

Subcounty

Village(s)

Cattle Sampled

Tb

Tc

Tv

Mixed

Prev (%)

Nabukalu

Naigaga

100

0

0

4

1

5.0

Buwunga

Busowa-Nawanjuki

37

0

0

2

1

8.0

Nankoma

Ivule-Bukagolo

100

0

6

18

4

28.0

Nabukalu

Iwemba-Busimbe

100

0

0

1

0

1.0

Kapyanga

Bugoyozi

100

0

0

4

0

4.0

Muterere

Mayuge

100

0

1

2

0

3.0

Buyinja

Sinde-West

25

0

1

1

0

8.0

Buluguyi

Budunyi

100

0

0

9

0

9.0

Buluguyi

Buduma B

100

0

1

3

0

4.0

Buyinja

Bumoli

100

0

1

5

0

6.0

Total

 

862

0

10

49

5

7.5



Table 2: Prevalence of trypanosome infections in cattle sampled at the 15 equidistant geo-referenced villages in Soroti district, 2009

Subcounty

Village

Cattle sampled

Tb

Tc

Tv

Mixed

Prev (%)

Pingire

Garama

100

0

2

1

1

4.0

Pingire

Opunoi

100

0

3

5

1

9.0

Bugondo

Olobai

100

1

0

4

0

5.0

Olio

Obulai

100

1

4

3

1

9.0

Pingire

Akimenga

100

1

2

5

1

9.0

Kateta

Ojetenyang

100

0

0

1

4

5.0

Atiira

Odokai

100

0

1

5

2

8.0

Kamuda

Owalai

100

2

2

3

0

7.0

Katine

Ajonyi

100

0

0

6

1

7.0

Tubur

Awasi

100

0

5

6

1

12.0

Arapai

Arabaka

100

0

0

0

0

0.0

Soroti

Amen

100

0

1

4

0

5.0

Kyere

Akisim

100

0

0

4

2

6.0

Kyere

Abuket

100

0

1

3

0

4.0

Gweri

Alere

100

1

1

3

0

5.0

Total

 

1500

6

22

53

14

6.3



Figure 2: Prevalence of infection due to different trypanosome species in cattle kept under tethering and open grazing, 2009

However, there were no significant differences between mean PCV of Ankole cattle under open grazing and tethering (P = 0.66) or Crosses under open grazing and tethering (P = 0.15) (Figure 3). But Nkedi Zebu cattle under open grazing had a significantly (P < 0.001) lower mean PCV than those under tethering. 

 

The prevalence of trypanosome infection in Nkedi Zebu, Ankole and crossbred cattle are shown in Tables 3 and 4. Nkedi Zebu had the highest prevalence (7.2%), followed by Ankole (7.0%). Crossbred cattle were free of infection. However, there was no significant difference among breeds (Nkedi Zebu vs Ankole; c2 = 0.005, d.f. = 1, P = 0.94; Nkedi Zebu vs Crosses; c2 = 1.08, d.f. = 1, P = 0.29). In addition, Nkedi Zebu had the highest mean PCV (29.0%), followed by Ankole (28.8%) and crosses (27.7%). But the differences among breeds were not significant (Nkedi Zebu vs Ankole, P = 0.71; Nkedi Zebu vs Crosses, P = 0.37; Ankole vs Crosses, P = 0.40).

 

The prevalence of trypanosome infection in Nkedi Zebu, Ankole and crossbred cattle are shown in Tables 3 and 4. Nkedi Zebu had the highest prevalence (7%), followed by Ankole (7%). Crossbred cattle were free of infection. However, there was no significant difference among breeds (Nkedi Zebu vs Ankole; c2 = 0.005, d.f. = 1, P = 0.94; Nkedi Zebu vs Crosses; c2 = 1.08, d.f. = 1, P = 0.29). In addition, Nkedi Zebu had the highest mean PCV (29.0%), followed by Ankole (28.8%) and crosses (27.7%) (Figure 3). But the differences among breeds were not significant (Nkedi Zebu vs Ankole, P = 0.71; Nkedi Zebu vs Crosses, P = 0.37; Ankole vs Crosses, P = 0.40).


Table 3: Prevalence of trypanosome infection in Nkedi Zebu, Ankole and crossbred cattle under

 tethering and open grazing systems, 2009

 

Tethering system

Open grazing system

Overall

Nkedi Zebu (n =1949)

7%

7%

7%

Ankole (n = 100)

0%

8%

7%

Cross (n = 14)

0%

0%

0%



Table 4: Prevalence of trypanosome infection due to different trypanosome species in Nkedi Zebu, Ankole

and crossbred cattle, 2009

Breed

Tb

Tc

Tv

Mixed

Prevalence

Nkedi Zebu (n =1949)

6

29

88

17

140 (7%)

Ankole (n = 100)

0

1

3

3

7 (7%)

Cross (n = 14)

0

0

0

0

0 (0%)

Overall (n =2063)

6

30

91

20

147 (7%)



Figure 3: Mean packed cell volume of Nkedi Zebu, Ankole and crossbred cattle kept under different grazing systems, 2009

The proportions of different trypanosome species found in cattle in the different grazing systems are shown in Figures 4a, b and c. Trypanosoma vivax was the dominant species, followed by T. congolense, mixed trypanosome species and T. brucei. Whereas the proportions of T.vivax and T. congolense infections in cattle under open grazing and tethering were similar, major differences in the proportion of mixed and T. brucei infection were observed. Cattle under open grazing had a higher proportion of mixed infection (14%) than those under tethering (7%). In addition, T. brucei infections were found only in cattle under open grazing.

Figure 4a: Proportion of different trypanosome species causing infection in cattle kept under tethering, 2009



Figure 4b: Proportion of different trypanosome species causing infection in cattle kept under open grazing, 2009



Figure 4c: Overall proportion of different trypanosome species causing infection in cattle, 2009

Discussion

The aim of the present study was to assess the prevalence of trypanosome infection in different breeds of cattle under different grazing system with a view to using this information to improve tsetse and trypanosomosis control in Eastern Uganda, given the changing breed composition and proportion of cattle under different grazing systems. This study revealed that Nkedi Zebu was the dominant breed and the majority of the cattle were kept under open grazing.

 

Although the prevalence of trypanosome infection needs to be interpreted with caution due to low sensitivity of the parasitological tests used, these findings are valuable for improvement of tsetse and trypanosomosis control. Cattle under open grazing had a higher prevalence of trypanosome infection and a significantly lower PCV than those under tethering. This concurs with other studies elsewhere, that revealed the prevalence of trypanosomosis to be highest in extensively managed stock or in migratory cattle (Hall et al 1983; Kalu 1995), which could be partly explained by the fact that extensive management (open grazing) increases the cattle-fly contact.

 

Differences were also observed among the different breeds; Nkedi Zebu had the highest prevalence, followed by Ankole and Crosses. Other workers have similarly found the prevalence of trypanosomosis to be influenced by breed, being highest where taurine cattle are predominant and herds belong to several owners from rural areas (Kalu 1995; Hendrickx et al 2000) or in trypanosusceptible cattle, especially the crossbreeds (Kalu 1995).   

 

Trypanosoma vivax was the dominant species, followed by T. congolense, mixed trypanosome species and T. brucei. Similarly previous studies in Uganda have found T. vivax to the dominant trypanosome species (Magona et al 1998; Magona et al 2000; Okiria et al 2002; Magona et al 2004a).  The proportion of T.vivax and T. congolense infections in cattle under open grazing and tethering were similar, but major differences in the proportion of mixed and T. brucei infection were observed. Cattle under open grazing had a higher proportion of mixed and T. brucei infections than those under tethering, probably because tethering restricts free movement of animals, thereby reducing chances of animals being bitten, while free movement of cattle under open grazing increases cattle-fly contact. Increased likelihood of substantial tsetse bites is likely to increase chances of exposure to wider spectrum of trypanosome species infection i.e. T. brucei, T. congolense and T. vivax.  

 

Conclusion


Acknowledgement

We are grateful to Michael Oretum, Geoffrey Odyek, Joseph Muboli and Robert Wabyanga for their technical assistance. This study received financial assistance from the FITCA Project (Uganda) for which we thank Mr. Ambrose Gidudu, the National Project Co-ordinator. This paper is published with permission of the Director, National Livestock Resources Research Institute (NaLIRRI), Tororo, Uganda.


References

Ford J and Katondo J 1976 The description of climatic conditions in Uganda. Atlas of Uganda, 6th Edition, Department of Lands and Surveys, Uganda. pp. 16-21.

 

Hall M J R, Kheir S M, Rahman A H A and Noga S 1983 Tsetse and trypanosomiasis survey of southern Darfur province, Sudan. Tropical Animal Health and Production 15: 191-206.  http://www.springerlink.com/content/p1ul7r113j61383g/

 

Hendrickx G, Napala A, Slingenbergh J H W, De Deken R, Vercruysse J and Rogers D J 2000 The spatial pattern of trypanosomosis prevalence predicted with the aid of satellite imagery. Parasitology 120: 121-134.  http://journals.cambridge.org/abstract_S0031182099005338/

 

Kalu A U 1995 Prevalence of trypanosomiasis among trypanotolerant cattle at the lower Benue River area of Nigeria. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 24: 97-103. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0167587795004637

 

Lancien J, Muguwa, J, Lannes C and Bouvier J B 1990 Tsetse and human trypanosomiasis challenge in South Eastern Uganda. Insect Science and its applications 11: 411-416.  http://www.sleeping-sickness.ird.fr/pdf/39840.pdf
 

Magona J W, Katabazi B, Olaho-Mukani W, Mayende J S P and Walubengo J 1997 Haemorrhagic Trypanosoma vivax outbreak in cattle in Mbale and Tororo districts of Eastern Uganda. Journal of Protozoology Research 7: 48-53.  http://ir.obihiro.ac.jp/dspace/bitstream/10322/261/1/Prot.Vol.7-2-3.pdf /

 

Magona J W, Okuna N M, Katabazi B, Okoth J O, Omollo P, Mayende J S P and Drabile D C 1998 Control of tsetse and animal trypanosome infection by combination of pour-on, trapping and chemotherapy along the Uganda - Kenya border. Revue d’Elevage et de Médecine Vétérinaire des Pays Tropicaux 51 (4): 311-315.  http://cat.inist.fr/?aModele=afficheN&cpsidt=1791080/

 

Magona J W, Greiner M and Mehlitz D 2000 Impact of tsetse control on the age-specific prevalence of trypanosome infection in village cattle in Southeast Uganda. Tropical Animal Health and Production 32: 87-98.  www.springerlink.com/index/H53171T1JX585472.pdf/

 

Magona J W and Mayende J S P 2002 Occurrence of concurrent trypanosome infection, theileriosis, anaplasmosis and helminthosis in Friesian, Zebu and Sahiwal cattle in Uganda. Onderstepoort Journal of Veterinary Research 69: 133 – 140. www.ojvr.org/

 

Magona J W, Mayende J S P, Okiria R and Okuna N M 2004a Protective efficacy of isometamidium chloride and diminazene aceturate against natural Trypanosoma brucei, Trypanosoma congolense and Trypanosoma vivax infections in cattle under a suppressed tsetse population in Uganda. Onderstepoort Journal of Veterinary Research 71: 231-237. www.ojvr.org/

 

Magona J W, Walubengo J and Odimim J J 2004b Differences in susceptibility to trypanosome infection between Nkedi Zebu and Ankole cattle under field conditions in Uganda. Annals of Tropical Medicine and Parasitology 98(8): 785-792. http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/maney/atmp/2004/00000098/00000008/art00002/

 

Magona J W, Walubengo J, Odiit M, Okedi L A, Abila P, Katabazi B K, Gidudu A M and Olaho-Mukani W 2005 Implications of the re-invasion of Southeast Uganda by Glossina pallidipes on the epidemiology of bovine trypanosomosis. Veterinary Parasitology 128 (1-2): 1-9.  http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304401704004960/

 

Murray M, Murray P K and McIntyre W I M 1977 An improved parasitological technique for the diagnosis of African trypanosomiasis. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medical and Hygiene 71: 325-326. www.rstmh.org/

 

Okiria R, Okuna N M, Magona J W and Mayende J S P 2002 Sustainability of tsetse control by subsequent treatment of 10% of a previously treated Ugandan cattle population with 1% w/v Deltamethrin. Tropical Animal Health and Production 34: 105-114. www.springer.com/life+sciences/animal.../journal/

 

Okoth J O, Okeith V and Ogola A 1991 Control of tsetse and trypanosomiasis transmission in Uganda by application of Lambdacyhalothrin. Medical and Veterinary Entomology 5: 121-128. www.wiley.com/bw/journal

 

Okuna N M, Okiria R, Odiit M, Mugenyi A, Olaho-Mukani W, Mayende J S P and Khisa V 1999 Trypanosoma brucei infection in cattle in Serere County, Soroti district at the onset of an outbreak of sleeping sickness. In: Proceedings of 25th Meeting of the International Scientific Conference on Trypanosomiasis Research and Control (ISCTRC) held at Mombasa, Kenya, 27 September – 1 October 1999. p.126. http://www.au-ibar.org/isctr/25Meeting/

 

Woo P K T 1969 The haematocrit centrifugation technique for the detection of trypanosomiasis in blood. Canadian Journal of Zoology 47: 921-923. www.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca/cgi-bin/cisti/journals/



Received 23 November 2010; Accepted 15 February 2011; Published 19 June 2011

Go to top