Livestock Research for Rural Development 38 (2) 2026 LRRD Search LRRD Misssion Guide for preparation of papers LRRD Newsletter

Citation of this paper

Coconut meat residue supplementation in Californian rabbit diets improves nutrient digestibility and growth performance

Nguyen Thi Kim Dong and Nguyen Van Thu

Tay Do University, 68 Tran Chien Street, Thanh My Area, Cai Rang Ward, Can Tho City, Vietnam
ntkdong@tdu.edu.vn

Abstract

A study was conducted to determine the optimal supplementation level of coconut meat residue (CMR) in the diets of growing Californian rabbits, with a focus on feed intake, nutrient digestibility and growth performance. A total of 60 Californian rabbits, with initial body weights of approximately 600, 850 and 1100 g, were assigned to a randomized complete block design consisting of five dietary treatments and three weight-based blocks. The dietary treatments included CMR supplementation at 0, 10, 20, 30 and 40 g/rabbit/day, designated as CMR0, CMR10, CMR20, CMR30 and CMR40, respectively. The trial lasted for 12 weeks. Results indicated that dry matter (DM), organic matter (OM), ether extract (EE) and metabolizable energy (ME) intakes increased (p<0.01) with higher levels of CMR supplementation, with the highest intakes observed in CMR30 and CMR40 groups. Rabbits fed the CMR30 diet achieved the greatest final live weight (2.663 kg) and daily weight gain (21.7 g/day), along with the highest economic return. Digestibility coefficients for DM, OM, EE and neutral detergent fiber (NDF) were also improved (p<0.01) with increasing CMR levels. In conclusion, supplementation of coconut meat residue at 30 g/rabbit/day optimizes growth performance and nutrient utilization in growing Californian rabbits and is therefore recommended for practical application in rabbit production.

Keywords: coconut meat waste, digestion, growth rate, nutrient utilization, rabbit


Introduction

Rapid industrialization in developing countries has increasingly encroached upon agricultural land, posing significant challenges to food production and security. In response, there is a growing need to adopt efficient and sustainable livestock systems. Among various options, rabbit farming emerges as a promising strategy due to rabbits' rapid growth rates, high feed conversion efficiency, adaptability to diverse environments and relatively low production costs. Moreover, rabbits can be raised using simple, locally available housing and can thrive on a variety of natural feed resources and agro-industrial by-products such as soybean meal, soya waste, sweet potato vines and natural grasses.

To optimize rabbit production, particularly in smallholder systems, identifying cost-effective and nutritionally adequate feed supplements is essential. The Mekong Delta of Vietnam, a key coconut-producing region, generates large quantities of coconut-based food products -including rice dishes, sweet soups, cakes and candies processed using coconut milk and meat to enhance flavor and texture. The extraction of coconut milk from coconut meat yields a substantial quantity of fresh coconut meat residue, which remains underutilized despite retaining a significant nutritional value, particularly in fat content (34- 41%) (Conatfood, 2013). Mohd Nor et al (2017) reported that coconut meat residue contains 55.4% moisture, 1.69% crude protein, 17.3% crude fat and 25.7% carbohydrates. Also, Harnentis et al (2022) showed that coconut meat waste contains low crude protein (5.81%), however high in ether extraction and carbohydrate contents. This by-product was supplemented in diets, improved feed intake and body weight gain for chicken. Previous studies have suggested the potential of this residue as a dietary supplement for ruminants, goats, pigs and fish (Tuong and Tuyen, 2024; Trung and Truong, 2024; Nhanthuy Food, 2025). Given its availability and nutrient profile, coconut meat residue may also be a viable feed supplement for rabbits when combined with other agricultural by-products. However, to date, no studies have evaluated its effects on the performance of growing Californian rabbits. This study aims to evaluate the effects of incorporating coconut meat residue into the diet of growing Californian rabbits, focusing on nutrient intake, digestibility, growth performance and economic efficiency. The findings are expected to contribute to the development of more sustainable and cost-effective feeding strategies for rabbit production in coconut-producing regions.


Materials and methods

Experimental Animals

The experiment was conducted on 60 purebred Californian rabbits, divided into three weight classes with average body weights of 600 g, 850 g and 1100 g per animal. All rabbits were vaccinated against parasitic and hemoggaric diseases prior to the experiment.

Experimental Design

The study consisted of two phases: a growth trial and a nutrient digestibility trial. A completely randomized block design was used with five dietary treatments and three blocks. The five treatments corresponded to diets supplemented different coconut meat residue levels of 0 g, 10 g, 20 g, 30 g and 40 g per rabbit per day. The three blocks were based on initial body weight groups (600 g, 850 g and 1100 g). Each experimental unit consisted of 4 rabbits (2 males and 2 females). The growth trial lasted for 12 weeks. The nutrient digestibility trial was conducted when the rabbits reached 12 weeks of age and lasted 7 days. Feed ingredient composition of diets in the experiment was showed in Table 1.

Table 1. Feed ingredient composition of diets in the experiment (g/rabbit/day)

Feed

Treatment

CMR 0

CMR 10

CMR 20

CMR 30

CMR 40

Coconut meat residue (CMR)

0

10

20

30

40

Soya waste

90

90

90

90

90

Extraction soybean meal

10

10

10

10

10

Operculina turpethum

80

80

80

80

80

Brachiaria mutica

Ad-libitum

Ad-libitum

Ad-libitum

Ad-libitum

Ad-libitum

CMR0, CMR10, CMR20, CMR30, CMR40 were diets supplemented Coconut meat residue at levels of 0, 10, 20, 30 and 40g/rabbit/day, respectively.

Housing, feeds and management

The experiment was conducted in 15 individual cages, each equipped with a feeder and drinker. Nylon mesh and plastic sheets were used to collect feces, urine and feed refusals.

Forages (Brachiaria mutica and Operculina turpethum) were harvested daily surrounding the experimental farm area. Soya waste and extraction soybean meal were sourced locally. Coconut meat residue was purchased from local factory, then sun-dried to increase dry matter content and improve its intake. All feed ingredients were analyzed for chemical composition before and during the trial. Feed given was weighed before feeding; refusals were collected and weighed in the next morning. Every two weeks, feed and refusal samples were analyzed. Rabbits were weighed weekly before feeding to calculate weight gain.

In the digestibility trial, feed intake was recorded daily. Feces and urine were collected two times per day (at 07:00 and 16:00 h), weighed and analyzed. Feeds, refusals and feces were dried, ground and analyzed for DM, OM, CP, EE, NDF, ADF and ash. Urine was analyzed for nitrogen on the day of collection.

Measurements

During the growth trial, the following parameters were recorded such as feed and nutrient intake, final live weight, weight gain, feed conversion ratio and economic efficiency.

In the digestibility experiment, data collected included nutrient intake, apparent digestibility coefficients of dry matter (DM), organic matter (OM), crude protein (CP), ether extract (EE), neutral detergent fiber (NDF) and acid detergent fiber (ADF), as well as nitrogen retention (g/kgW0.75).

Chemical Analyses

Feed samples were analyzed for dry matter (DM), organic matter (OM), crude protein (CP), ether extract (EE) and total ash following AOAC (1990) methods. NDF and ADF were determined according to Van Soest et al (1991). Apparent digestibility coefficients were calculated using the method described by McDonald et al (2010).

Statistical Analysis

Data were analyzed using the General Linear Model (GLM) procedure in Minitab Release 20.3 (2021). Differences among treatments and pairwise comparisons were assessed using Tukey’s test as implemented in Minitab 18.1.


Results and discussion

Growth experiment
Chemical composition of feeds

The chemical composition of feed ingredients in growth trial was presented in Table 2.

Table 2. Chemical composition of feed ingredients in growth trial

Feed

DM

OM

CP

EE

NDF

ADF

Ash

ME, MJ/kgDM

Brachiaria mutica

17.4

89.6

12.3

3.56

64.3

42.2

10.4

7.60

Operculina turpethum

16.0

88.4

16.4

4.85

40.2

30.3

11.6

9.69

Coconut meat residue

41.5

97.3

4.06

36.1

58.3

32.6

2.70

13.2

Soya waste

12.3

95.4

21.2

23.1

32.3

27.1

4.60

12.3

Extraction soybean meal

92.5

95.0

42.0

10.5

18.7

12.3

5.00

12.9

DM: dry matter, OM: organic matter, CP: crude protein, EE: extracted ether, NDF: neutral detergent fiber , ADF: acid detergent fiber, ME: metabolizable energy (Maertens, 2002)

The feed ingredients used in this study demonstrate a diverse nutrient profile, supporting balanced rabbit nutrition. Brachiaria mutica with moderate dry matter (17.4%), crude protein (12.3%) and neutral detergent fiber (64.3%) are consistent in DM and NDF results, while higher CP value than that of a previous study on Brachiaria mutica reported (Thanh et al 2025). Although lower in protein than legumes, it provides essential fiber for gut motility in rabbits. Operculina turpethum with higher CP (16.4%) and lower NDF (40.2%) than Brachiaria mutica contributes significantly to dietary protein while maintaining acceptable fiber levels for digestion. Coconut meat residue (CMR), though low in CP (4.1%), had a high ether extract content (36.1%), confirming its value as an energy-dense ingredient. The DM, CP and NDF contents of CMR are in a range of those (42.2, 3.7, 57.5%, respectively) reported by Trung and Truong (2024). These complementary nutritional profiles-forages like Brachiaria mutica supplying essential fiber for gut motility (Gidenne, 2015). Operculina turpethum boosting protein intake and coconut residue delivering dense energy-support efficient digestion and performance in growing rabbits, as evidenced by improved ME and EE intakes in this study. Soya waste, a by-product of soymilk processing, provided moderate protein (21.2%) and was consistent with values reported by Trung et al (2025), who highlighted its potential as a sustainable protein source in rabbit diets. Similarly, extraction soybean meal had the highest protein content (42.0%), aligning with global standards for commercial protein supplements used in rabbit nutrition.

These feed ingredients, especially when locally sourced, support cost-effective and nutritionally adequate rabbit diets. The integration of agro-industrial by-products like coconut meat residue and soya waste is in line with sustainable feeding strategies promoted by recent research (FAO 2023), reducing feed costs while maintaining growth performance.

Feed and nutrient intakes of rabbits in the growth experiment

Feed and nutrient intakes of rabbits in the growth experiment was presented in Table 3.

Table 3. Daily feed and nutrient intakes of rabbits in the growth experiment

Item

Treatment

SEM

p

CMR0

CMR10

CMR20

CMR30

CMR40

Feed intake, DM g/ani.

Brachiaria mutica

114

110

108

109

116

6.44

0.857

Operculina turpethum

128

122

119

111

127

7.67

0.551

Coconut meat residue

_

12.7d

21.3c

32.3b

42.7a

0.38

0.001

Soya waste

135

135

135

135

135

0.89

0.461

Extraction soybean meal

19.7

18.0

17.7

19.7

19.0

0.95

0.477

Nutrient intake, g DM/ani.

DM

74.9b

77.1b

79.2b

84.7ab

92.3a

2.03

0.002

OM

68.9c

71.1bc

73.3ab

78.6ab

85.7a

1.85

0.001

CP

16.9

16.3

16.1

16.9

17.4

0.51

0.473

EE

7.40e

9.07d

10.2c

12.0b

13.7a

0.19

0.001

NDF

27.9c

29.8c

31.3bc

34.0b

38.3a

0.82

0.001

ADF

20.8c

21.9bc

22.8bc

24.2ab

27.2a

0.61

0.001

Ash

6.10

6.00

5.97

6.06

6.58

0.18

0.201

ME, MJ/ani.

0.79c

0.82c

0.85bc

0.93ab

1.01a

0.02

0.001

a,.b,c,d, e . mean values with different superscripts within the same row are different at p<0 05.

Table 3 indicates that the intake of Brachia mutica and Operculina turpethum did not differ significantly among treatments (p>0.05). Coconut meat residue intake increased (p<0.05) with dietary inclusion, from 12.7 g in CMR10 to 42.7 g/animal/day in CMR40. This contributed to a linear rise in total dry matter (DM) and organic matter (OM) intake (p< 0.05). Neutral detergent fiber (NDF) and acid detergent fiber (ADF) intakes increased with higher CMR inclusion levels (p<0.05), reflecting the fibrous nature of coconut meat residue (58% NDF).

Metabolizable energy (ME) intake rose from 0.79 MJ in the CMR0 to 1.01 MJ/animal/day in the CMR40 (p<0.05), consistent with findings by Diem (2022), who reported that coconut oil supplementation enhanced energy intake and nutrient digestibility in rabbits.

Overall, the inclusion of coconut meat residue improved total nutrient and energy intake without negatively affecting protein intake, suggesting its suitability as a fibrous energy source in rabbit diets.

The total dry matter intake increased progressively across the treatments, from 76.6 g/animal/day in the CMR0 treatment to 90.8 g/animal/day in the CMR40 treatment (p<0.05). The EE intake also increased (p<0.05), from 29.7 g/animal/day in CMR0 to 37.7 g/animal/day in CMR40. Also, metabolizable energy (ME) intake increased gradually from CMR0 to CMR40, ranging from 0.79 to 1.01MJ/animal/day (p<0.05). This increase may be attributed to the progressive inclusion of coconut meat residue. The effect of CMR intake on DM intake of Californian rabbit was presented in Regression equation, y = 0.402x + 72.9, with R2 = 0.92 (Figure 1).

Figure 1. Effect of CMR intake (g/d) on DM intake of Californian rabbit
Growth performance and feed conversion ratio of experimental rabbits

Daily weight gain, final live weight, feed conversion ratio and economic efficiency of Californian rabbits are presented in Table 4.

Table 4. Daily weight gain (DWG), final live weight and feed conversion ratio (FCR) of rabbits

Item

Treatment

SEM

p

CMR0

CMR10

CMR20

CMR30

CMR40

Initial live weight, g

861

863

855

841

867

21.7

0.92

Final live weight, g

2313b

2399ab

2483ab

2663a

2640ab

71.9

0.04

DWG, g/rabbit

17.3c

18.3bc

19.4bc

21.7a

21.1ab

0.66

0.007

FCR

4.33

4.22

4.08

3.91

4.39

0.18

0.37

a .b. c.mean values with different superscripts within the same row are different at p<0.05.

Table 4 indicates that daily weight gain (DWG) differed among treatments (p< 0.05), with the lowest in CMR0 (17.3 g/day) and the highest in CMR30 (21.7 g/day). This increase corresponds with improved energy intake from coconut meat residue inclusion in the CMR30 treatment. Daily weight gains in the current trial are in a range of 18.3 - 21.8 g of a previous study on rabbits supplemented sweet potato tuber residue associated with copra cake in diets cited by Dong and Thu (2016). Also, comparable growth rates (16.9-20.9 g) in a study on rabbits fed natural plants and grasses with supplemented coconut oil, cited by Diem (2022). Results of final live weight (FLW) corresponded to the DWG, also increased (p< 0.05) for the treatments supplemented CMR, with the CMR30 achieving the highest (2,663 g) and CMR0 the lowest (2,313 g). The effect of ME intake on DWG was presented in the regression equations, y= -151x2 + 290x – 118, with Rē = 0.98 (Figure 2).

Figure 2. Effect of ME intake (MJ/d) on DWG (g) of Californian rabbit
Digestibility experiment
Feed and nutrient intakes of rabbits in the digestibility experiment

Feed and nutrient intakes of rabbits in the digestibility experiment were shown in Table 5.

Table 5. Feed and nutrient intake of rabbits in the digestibility experiment

Item

Treatment

SEM/p

CMR0

CMR10

CMR20

CMR30

CMR40

DM

76.6b

82.3ab

85.2ab

88.2ab

90.8ab

1.97/0.007

OM

70.4b

75.8ab

78.8ab

81.9b

84.4ab

1.76/0.004

CP

17.2

17.4

17.5

17.7

17.4

0.27/0.687

EE

7.97e

9.67d

11.1c

12.5b

13.8a

0.10/0.001

NDF

29.7b

33.0ab

34.7ab

35.9ab

37.7a

1.33/0.023

ADF

6.18

6.42

6.41

6.36

6.36

0.21/0.933

Ash

0.8ac

0.86bc

0.89b

0.94ab

0.96a

0.01/0.001

ME, MJ/ani./day

0.80c

0.86bc

0.89b

0.94a

0.96a

0.01/0.001

a .b. c, d, e. mean values with different superscripts within the same row are different at p<0.05.

Dry matter intake (DMI) increased (p<0.05) across the treatments, ranging from 76.6 g/animal/day in the CMR0 to 90.8 g/animal/day in the CMR40 treatment. Metabolizable energy (ME) intake also increased (p<0.05), from 0.80 to 0.96 MJ/animal/day, likely due to the incremental inclusion of coconut meat residue, which contributed additional fermentable fiber and energy.

Nutrient digestibility and nitrogen retention of rabbits in digestibility trial

Nutrient digestibility and Nitrogen retention of rabbits in digestibility trial were shown in Table 6

Table 6. Apparent nutrient digestibility (%) and Nitrogen retention (g/kg W0,75) of rabbits in digestibility trial

Item

Treatment

SEM /p

CMR0

CMR10

CMR20

CMR30

CMR40

Digestibility, %

DMD

66.1b

72.5ab

75.6a

79.0a

76.0a

1.67/0.005

OMD

66.5b

73.0ab

75.9a

79.3a

76.6a

1.65/0.005

CPD

78.0

83.7

85.3

87.1

85.1

2.09/0.103

EED

70.2c

76.7b

81.2ab

85.1a

84.3a

1.23/0.001

NDFD

46.4b

58.8ab

64.4a

65.8a

65.4a

2.13/0.001

ADFD

45.7

45.9

46.8

49.7

48.0

2.06/0.212

N balance (g/kg W0.75)

N intake

1.67

1.72

1.74

1.71

1.64

0.07/0.878

N retention

1.07

1.04

1.18

1.26

1.22

0.07/0.182

a .b. c mean values with different superscripts within the same row are different at P<0 05.

Dry matter digestibility (DMD) improved (p<0.05) with increasing coconut meat residue inclusion, peaking at 79.0% in the CMR30 treatment before a slight decline in the CMR40 treatment. These values exceed the range (62-70%) commonly reported for high-fiber rabbit diets (Gidenne, 2015), indicating enhanced fermentability of the supplemented fiber. Crude protein digestibility (78.0-87.1%) showed a non-significant upward trend (p>0.05), likely due to improved microbial activity and better nitrogen synchronization. NDF digestibility was positively influenced by coconut meat residue inclusion, the significantly higher values for the diets supplemented coconut meat residue (p<0.05).

Nitrogen intake and retention did not differ significantly (p>0.05), though N retention improved slightly across treatments. This indicates stable nitrogen utilization, in agreement with findings by Gidenne et al (2012), who noted marginal effects of moderate fiber supplementation on nitrogen balance. The effect of NDF intake on NDF digestibility was showed in regression equation, y = - 0.355x2 + 26.4x - 424, with Rē = 0.99 (Fig. 3).

Figure 3. Effect of NDF intake (g/d) on NDF digestibility (%)


Conclusion


References

AOAC 1990 Official methods of analysis, 15th edn. Association of Official Analytical Chemist. Washington, DC.

FAO 2023 Sustainable animal feeding practices using agro-industrial by-products. Food and Agriculture Organization.

Gidenne T 2015 Dietary fibres in the nutrition of the growing rabbit and recommendations to preserve digestive health: A review. Animal, 9(2), 227–242.

Gidenne T, Combes S and Fortun-Lamothe L 2012 Feed intake limitation strategies for the growing rabbit: Effect on feeding behaviour, welfare, performance, digestive physiology and health.: A review. Animal, 6(9), 1407–1419.

Harnentis RA,Yuliaty SN and Nurul H 2022 The effect of coconut meat waste supplementation with thermophilic bacteria and thermostable mananase on performance gut histomorphology and microbiota of broiler chickens. Online J. Anim. Feed
Res., 12(6): 363-371. Link: https://ojafr.com/main/attachments/article/165/OJAFR%2012(6)%20363-371,%202022.pdf

Le Thi Phuong Thanh, Nguyen Van Thu, Shu-Yi Liaw and Nguyen The Hien 2025 Sustainable Yield and Economic Efficiency of Para Grass (Brachiaria mutica) Using Composted Cow Manure. Sustainability 2025 , 17, 9649 https://doi.org/10.3390/su17219649

Le Thi Thuy Diem 2022 Effects of different coconut oil supplementation in diets on growth rate, nutrient digestibility of crossbred rabbits. MSc Thesis in Animal Science, CanTho University.

Maertens L, Perez M T, Villamide M, Cervera C, Gideme T and Xiccato G 2002 Nutritive value of raw materials for rabbits: Ergan tables 2002. World Rabbit Science. 10: 157 -166 pp.

McDonald P, Edward 2010 Animal Nutrition, 6th Edition. Longman Scientific and Technical. New York. Pp: 245-255

Minitab 2021 Minitab reference manual release 20.3, Minitab Inc.

Mohd Nor N N, Abbasiliasi S, Marikkar M N, Arbakariya A, Mehrnoush A, Dhilia U L, Mohd Y A M and Shuhaimi M 2017 Defatted coconut residue crude polysaccharides as potential prebiotics: study of their effects on proliferation and acidifying activity of probiotics in vitro. J Food Sci Technol 54, 164–173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-016-2448-9.

Nguyen Ba Trung and Nguyen Binh Truong 2024Effectiveness of coconut meat waste in feed intake, digestion and protein retention in goats. Online J. Anim. Feed Res. 14 (2), 137-143.

Nguyen Thi Kim Dong and Nguyen Van Thu 2016 Effect of supplementation of sweet potato tuber residue associated coconut cake on growth rate and carcass quality and nutrient digestibility of crossbred rabbits (New Zealand x local). Science Journal of Cantho university /ISSN. 1859- 2333.

Nhanthuy food 2025 What Is Coconut Press Cake Used For? Waste It or Reuse It? https://nhanthuyfood.com/blog/ba-dau-dua-dung-de-lam-gi//

Tran Van Tuong and Nguyen Quang Tuyen 2024 Live stock production. Textbook (Vietnamese). Thai Nguyen University of Agriculture and Forestry. Ministry of Education and Training. Vietnam.

Truong Thanh Trung, Nguyen Thuy Linh, Nguyen Thi Kim Dong and WinDial Zahra 2025 Utilizing Fermented Soya Waste in the Diet of Boer Crossbred Goats. Adv. Anim. Vet. Sci. 13(5): 972-979.

Van Soest P J, Robertson J B and Lewis B A 1991 Symposium: Carbohydrate methodology, metabolism and nutritional implications in dairy cattle: methods for dietary fiber and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J. Dairy Sci. 74, pp. 3585-3597.