Livestock Research for Rural Development 17 (9) 2005 Guidelines to authors LRRD News

Citation of this paper

Turkey's livestock sector: Production, consumption and policies

C Akbay and I Boz

Kahramanmaras Sutcu Imam University, Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Agricultural Economics,
Kahramanmaras, Turkey
cakbay@ksu.edu.tr

Abstract

The Turkish livestock sector has considerable potential and is an important part of the agricultural sector and economy. Livestock constitute approximately 25% of the value of all agricultural production and contribute to the economic development of rural households. The main objectives of this study were to determine trends in production and consumption patterns of livestock products in Turkey and identify opportunities for developing livestock strategies.

Seventy percent of the rural farms in Turkey own livestock. Most of these livestock farmers rely on their livestock for income by selling of milk and animals as well as fertilizer for crops. Although livestock productivity has been increasing in the last two decades, the number of large and small ruminants has decreased. Although livestock production has been decreasing, lower income and high consumer prices relative to other countries have not generally encouraged consumption of animal products. Per capita consumption of milk and red meat products has decreased and meat consumption has shifted over time from beef, veal, lamp, mutton and goat to a greater consumption of poultry and fish due to changing tastes, costs and income. Moreover, a further decline in the number of small and large ruminants may also reduce the sustainable potential of Turkey's agricultural sector.

Key words: Turkey, livestock, production, consumption, food


Introduction

Turkey is located between Europe and Asia, and unique for having promoted a large and sustainable agricultural sector. It's a main producer of agricultural products and one of the few self-sufficient countries in the world in terms of agricultural production, especially for production of food items. It is also one of the richest and largest countries in terms of land: Almost 16% of the country's land area consists of meadows and pastures, whereas 26% is forest and woodland and 31% is arable lands (FAO 2004). Because of its suitable land and climate, Turkey has a great capacity to grow many kinds of crops and animals. Although, since 1950, both agricultural and cultivated lands have increased by almost 40% and 70%, respectively, fallow land, pasture and meadows have decreased by 78 and 70%, respectively.

Historically, the agricultural sector has been Turkey's largest employer and a major contributor to the country's gross domestic production, industrial growth and exports. However, as the country has developed, the relative importance of agricultural sector has declined, while the position of industry and the service sectors have increased. For example, between 1980 and 2003, the share of agricultural products in exports declined from 57% to 7%, while industrial exports rose from 36% to 90%, signaling a wholesale shift from an agrarian to an industrial economy. Moreover, although agriculture accounts for less than 10% of the GDP, it employs more than 42% of national labor force in 2003 (SIS 2003).

Livestock and their products are major component in agriculture in the developing countries and provide direct cash income for many farmers. In these countries, animals are living bank for many farmers and critical to agricultural intensification via provision of power and manure for fertilizer and fuel (Sansoucy et al 1995). Livestock include ruminants for meat and milk, camels and equines for draught and poultry (chicken and turkeys) for eggs and meat. Poultry products are gaining importance and account for a major share of animal products in human diets in many countries (Nordblom et al 2005). Animal foods are an important source of food particularly high quality protein, minerals, vitamin and micronutrients and have also major importance for optimizing human performance in chronically mild to moderately malnourished populations (Diaz-Briquets et al 1992; Sansoucy et al 1995).

In Turkey, on the other hand, livestock sector has a considerable potential and is an important part of agricultural sector and economy. The Livestock products, including meat, milk, eggs, honey, wool, and hides, play a significant role in the Turkish economy. Animal husbandry constituted approximately 25% of agricultural production value in 2002 (SIS 2003). The sector's contribution to farm income is substantial, and activities related to livestock production and marketing are important to the economic development of rural areas in Turkey (Yurdakul et al 1999). In parts of country where agriculture and farming are limited because of land shape or limited land and high number of population, households make their living with animals, especially in Eastern and Southeastern Anatolia. However, in these regions, mostly traditional techniques are used, and the results are not much satisfactory when compared to developed countries.

Providing an adequate and balanced diet for the population, and in particular increasing per capita consumption of animal protein, has long been a challenge in a country like Turkey which, over the last 60 years, has persistently experienced high net rates of population growth (Anil 1995). The most important objective of agricultural policies in Turkey according to Government's Five-Year Development Plans is to meet the nutritional needs of a rapidly growing population. As long-term goal, the government would like to see the consumption of animal protein brought up to levels closer to those of developed countries. The data in Table 1 shows the difference in consumption patterns between Turkey and developed and developing countries. In 2003, per capita consumption of meat, milk and fish in Turkey were 24.2, 48.5 and 35.1 percent of that in developed countries and 67.6, 215.0 and 58.0 percent of that in developing countries.

In recent years, Turkey's livestock sector has displayed three clear trends: (1) declining number of large and small ruminants; (2) decreasing per capita consumption of animal products; and (3) increasing productivity. Livestock development in Turkey, especially in lower-income regions, needs to operate within the overall development objectives of reducing rural poverty, promoting rural development and enhancing sustainability. The main objectives of this study are to determine trends on production and consumption patterns of livestock products in Turkey and identify opportunities for developing livestock strategies.

This paper is structured as follows: The first section includes the introduction. An evaluation of livestock sector in Turkey is presented in the second section. The third section describes livestock population and production trends. Turkish food and livestock consumption behavior is presented in the fourth section. The last section summarizes our concluding remarks and policies.

Table 1. Per capita consumption of livestock products in 2003, kg/year

Region

Milk

Red meat

Fish

Poultry

Eggs

World

79.02

27.64

28.44

11.71

8.40

Developing countries

45.61

20.45

24.98

8.01

7.21

Developed countries

202.14

54.17

41.27

25.31

12.81

European Union (25)

241.71

67.46

42.29

21.56

12.77

Turkey

98.05

9.42

14.49

9.83

6.91

Source: FAO, FAOSTAT Data Base

Livestock Sector in Turkey

Livestock products are an important source of household income for many farmers and households in rural areas. For small farmers, livestock products such as cattle, sheep and goat generate income and ensure food security for these households because an important amount of their incomes comes from the sales of animal and milk.

In Turkey, the family owned farm is the basic unit of agricultural production, and family members provide most of the farm labor. The information on the number and size of holdings are inferred from agricultural censuses, which are conducted every 10 years on the basis of large sample surveys (Togan et al 2004). Historically, the total number of farms in Turkey has been decreasing while the average size of farms has been increasing after 1990s. In 2001, there were 3.08 million farms with an average of 59.9 acres per farm, compared to 1990 when 4.09 million producers farmed an average of 56,8 acres per farm. Number of farms which produced only crop products represented 30% of the total firms in 2001. Number of farms which produce both crop and animal products constitute the largest group of farms, comprising 70% of all farms, and contain 30% of all land in farms. In addition, the statistics in 2001 show that 25% of all farms were engaged only in crop production and 96% of all engaged in crop production and animal husbandry, while the reminder 4% were engaged only on animal production. However, the number of large ruminants per farm decreased from 6.0 in 1980 to 4.6 in 1990 and 3.6 in 2001. The number of small ruminants per farm increased from 39.8 in 1980 to 42.1 in 1990 and decreased to 12.8 in 2003. The land and livestock owned are also distributed unequally. 1.8% of the farmers do not own any land. Small farmers (<50 acres), which constitute 65% of the farmers, own little over 21.3% of the land, less than 50% of the sheep and goat and 49% of the cattle. The larger farmers (> 200 acres) constitute 5.7% of the holdings, own 34.2% of the land, 14.5% of the sheep and goat and 10.1% of the cattle (Table 2).

Table 2. Number of farms, and animals by farm size and types

Farm Size, acres

Total

Crop production and animal husbandry

Only crop production

Only Animal husbandry

A

B

C

A

B

C

A

A

B

C

Total

  3075515

27511119

11145155

2073600

24983659

10761064

  929486

  72429

 2 527460

  384091

No land

  54321

 1812988

  299658

-

-

-

-

  54321

 1 812988

  299658

Less than 5

  177891

  578849

  265274

  86121

  519921

  257241

  89061

  2709

  58928

  8033

5-9

  290328

 1151677

  479804

  167805

 1100582

  474523

  121157

  1366

  51095

  5281

10-19

  539508

 3685515

 1250687

  348012

 3209764

 1219893

  186019

  5477

  475751

  30794

20-49

  950542

 6465595

 3128721

  680795

 6379904

 3094617

  262529

  7218

  85691

  34104

50-99

  560005

 5426756

 2746218

  422865

 5411511

 2743752

  136362

778

  15245

  2466

100-199

  327327

 4396438

 1852127

  244514

 4373039

 1849091

  82296

517

  23399

  3036

200-499

  153688

 3250854

  948992

  109522

 3246491

  948273

  44123

43

  4363

719

500-999

  17428

  422884

  111534

  10777

  422884

  111534

  6651

-

-

-

1000-2499

  4199

  195721

  44149

  2 951

  195721

  44149

  1248

-

-

-

2500-4999

222

  24186

  2435

203

  24186

  2435

19

-

-

-

5000+

56

  99656

  15556

35

  99656

  15556

21

-

-

-

*A: Number of farms, B: number of small ruminants  (in all ages), C: Number of large ruminants (in all ages)
Source: SIS 2003: Statistical yearbook of Turkey, State Institution of Statistics, Turkey

In Turkey, Cattle, goats and sheep fulfill multiple roles in generating income and ensuring food security as well as generate employment and limit rural depopulation. Moreover, the meat sector provides employment for slaughter, marketing and processing. For instance, in the rural area of the East Anatolia, 78% of cows were dual purpose compared to 48% in the Southern Anatolia. Livestock give increased economic stability to farm household, acting as a cash buffer (small stock), a capital reserve (large animals) and a hedge against inflation. In a mixed farming system, livestock reduce the risk through diversification of production and income sources and therefore a much greater ability to deal with seasonal crop failures and other natural calamities.

Relative importance of livestock production in Turkey is given in Table 3. As it is seen in table, the share of livestock production is rather low as compared to that in the developed countries, and vegetal production constitutes the major share of total production. In 2002, the share of plant products in the total agricultural production value is 69.3%, that of livestock products is 25.3%, for fisheries, it is 2.6% and 2.9 % for forestry. However, the share of livestock in total agricultural production in developed countries is about 60-70%.

Table 3. Relative importance of livestock production in Turkey, 1993-2002

Year

Share of subgroups in total agricultural production value, %

Crops

Livestock

Forestry

Fish

Total

1993

68.97

21.14

4.59

5.30

100.00

1994

65.90

26.97

4.06

3.07

100.00

1995

63.99

29.48

3.35

3.19

100.00

1996

66.52

26.95

3.05

3.48

100.00

1997

67.07

26.86

2.97

3.10

100.00

1998

67.62

26.76

2.89

2.73

100.00

1999

63.60

30.88

3.10

2.42

100.00

2000

65.59

28.89

3.13

2.40

100.00

2001

68.15

26.30

3.30

2.25

100.00

2002

69.26

25.28

2.90

2.56

100.00

Source: SIS 2003: Statistical yearbook of Turkey, State Institution of Statistics, Turkey
SIS 2002: Agricultural production value and prices, State Institution of Statistics, Turkey


Livestock Population and Production Trends

Historically, livestock inventory data show that the number of large ruminant and small ruminant animals were increasing before the 1980s but have decreased since the early 1980s (Table 4). Given the Turkish dietary preferences, sheep have relatively high value and increased in number from 34.5 million head in 1960 to 46 million head in 1980 but declined to 27 million head in 2003 (Table 5). The number of goats declined during the same period from 24 million to 7 million because of grazing restrictions in forests and government policies encouraging herd reduction. The use of tractors probably has caused the decline in number of oxen. Cattle, which have risen in value as farmers strive to meet the growing urban demand for milk and meat, increased in number from 12.4 million head in 1960 to 15 million in 1980, but decreased to 10.4 million head in 2003. In contrast to the red meat sector, the numbers of poultry and beehives have steadily increased during the same period. Poultry products are gaining importance and account for a major share of animal products in human diets in Turkey as in many other countries. By 2000, Turkey had 264.5 million head of poultry, almost four times higher than the number in 1990.

Regarding the number of animals and level of yields per animal, it should be clearly stated that yields were rather low as compared to the developed countries. Carcass yield data for cattle slaughter indicates that a substantial growth in yield has taken place since the early 1980s. For instance, according to Turkish State Institution of Statistics, the average carcass weight of cattle has increased from 120.5 kg in 1984-86 to 176.7 in 1997-99, an average growth of nearly 3 percent annually. This number is approximately 2 and 1.5 times less than USA (247 kg) and Europe (320), respectively and slightly higher than Africa (133 kg). Average lamb carcass yield has increased from 12.1 kg in 1984 to 14.9 kg in 1998, an average annual increase of 1.6 percent. However, this number is well below the USA (33 kg) and slightly higher than Europe (14 kg). It is commonly accepted that per-cow milk yields in Turkey have also grown since the early 1980s. However, per-cow milk yield in Turkey is still low (1567 kg) and approximately 4.6 times less than USA (7227 kg) and 3.4 times less than Germany (5320). Average honey yield per beehive has increased from 5.3 kg in 1960 to 17.9 kg in 2002. Although the number of beehives had increased only 3 times between 1960 and 2003, honey production increased almost 10 times during the same period (Topuz 2000). Despite the significant growth in carcass and milk yields, the productivity increases have not been sufficient to prevent reduction in output potential caused by declining animal inventories, particularly in the sheep sector (Koc et al 2001). Moreover, although yields were growing, traditional methods kept the livestock industry from achieving its considerable potential. Only 20 percent of cattle, for example, were high yielding variety breeds.

Table 4. Numbers of human and livestock population in Turkey (1960-2003)

Year

Human Population

Large ruminant

Small ruminant

Poultry

1960

27755000

13640390

59095408

29939000

1970

35605000

14406000

56618016

35646000

1980

44737000

16619000

64801008

58284000

1990

56473000

12604000

55589008

69529000

2000

67804000

10908000

35693000

264451000

2003

70318000

10564900

34000000

222600000

Change, %
1960-2003

153.35

-22.55

-42.47

643.51

Source: FAO, FAOSTAT Data Base

Most livestock generally are grazed on public lands on a first-come first-serve basis and provided with little or no additional supplements. Supplemental feeding of forages is limited because of the production policy which favors field crop production. Since grazing is unregulated, public lands tend to be severally overgrazed which only further aggravates the problem. Moreover, the increasing grain cultivation lands resulted overgrazing of grasslands, wasteland, forests and mountain meadows, which damaged the soil, and less productive animals.

Pastures play a very important role for ruminant feeding. About 69% of crude protein, 62% of starch and 33% of roughage needs of the ruminant livestock are provided by pasture (Karagoz 2004). The rest of the feed is obtained from cultivated forages, concentrates, cereal and grain legume straw, agro-industry by-products and residues. The share of the forage crop production area in total arable lands is about 3%. Although there has been a slightly increase in recent years, this figure is far behind the desire level (Karagoz 2004). Even if farmers have no land, most village families own a few animals. Rural families raise livestock on land that lacks alternative uses. Few farmers integrate livestock production with cropping activities or match feed supply to their animals' requirement. In recent years, there has been a trend toward raising cattle in open-air commercial feedings in Western Turkey (Sarigedik 2003).

A number of forces have conspired over the past two decides to bring about a continuous decline in Turkish sheep and goat herd, which is forecast to continue declining through 2010, despite improved markets for sheep and goat meet. The first of these is the nature of Turkish production, which is small-scale and heavily reliant of domestic breeds, which though better adapted to the harsh climate of Eastern Turkey, are much less productive than western breeds. More important in the short-term, is the fact that roughly half the national herd is located in Eastern Turkey, where continuing unrest has made animal husbandry in general difficult. These conditions have created a situation in which improved prices have actually provided an incentive to producers to increase slaughter in order to cash in, rather than withholding sheep to rebuild herd numbers (Sarigedik 2003).

Table 5. Trends in livestock numbers (1000) in Turkey (1960-2003)

Year

Sheep

Goat

Cattle

Camel

Buffalo

Poultry

Beehives

1960

34463

24632

12435

65

1140

29939

1487

1970

36351

20267

13189

39

1178

35646

1794

1980

46026

18775

15567

12

1040

58284

2226

1990

43647

11942

12173

2

429

69539

3283

2000

28492

7201

10761

1

146

264451

4115

2003

27000

 7000 

10400

1

164

222600

4200

Change, %

-21.7

-71.6

-16.4

-98.6

-85.6

643.5

282.4

Source: FAO, FAOSTAT Data Base

Cattle numbers and beef and veal production continue to decline even though domestic demand has increased, resulting in high meat prices. The productions of main livestock products are given in Table 6 for last 40 years. Unfortunately, there are not any data relating to livestock production in 2003. Livestock product supply in Turkey is generally well below demand because of low animal productivity, inappropriate technologies, inadequate research and extension support, poor infrastructure and unfavorable external conditions. However, Turkey has shown rapid growth on poultry production in the last 20 years in contrast to slow growth on the red meat production. During the 1980s, the price of red meat increased sharply, leading to a fall in domestic meat demand and increase in poultry consumption. However, meat demand was partially sustained by exports of live animals - some of them smuggled over borders - to Middle Eastern Countries, especially Iran and Iraq. Production of red meat grew by only 1.18% which has been below the annual population growth rates of 2.1% across Turkey. Red meat production has grown more slowly than white meat, partly reflecting rapid industrialization of white meat production as in many developing countries. Total meat production grew at a higher rate than milk production. However, grow rate of red meat and milk production over 1960-2002 period are much behind from poultry, fish, eggs and honey production rates.

By 2010, animal products are expected to contribute proportionally more to food supply and food security in Turkey then they do at present. It is projected that during the next 10 years, rates of milk and meat production will surpass those of the major cereals and that the increases in production from monogastric animals will continue to be considerably higher than from ruminants, provided feed is economically available for production (Sansoucy et al 1995).

Table 6. Livestock production in Turkey  (million ton)

Product

1960

1970

1980

1990

2000

2002

Change,%

Red meat

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Beef

109.1

134.5

141.0

372.1

358.7

329.3

301.9

Lamb/mutton

243.0

267.0

239.4

304.0

321.0

286.0

117.7

Goat

53.0

59.0

52.6

66.0

53.0

46.5

87.7

White meat

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Poultry

65.2

104.2

250.0

415.0

660.9

710.9

1089.8

Pork

0.43

0.49

0.33

0.33

0.27

0.04

8.6

Total meat
(excl fish)

477.9

571.7

687.7

1160.9

1396.7

1375.5

287.8

Fish

162.0

348.1

848.3

721.1

1139.9

1163.7

718.5

Eggs

65.4

95.7

206.7

384.9

675.4

543.0

830.3

Honey

8.0

14.9

25.2

51.3

61.1

74.6

931.8

Milk

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cow

4830.0

5722.6

7710.6

7960.6

8732.0

7490.6

155.1

Goat

644.0

481.6

483.0

337.5

220.2

209.6

32.5

Sheep

784.5

860.0

1147.4

1145.0

774.4

657.4

83.8

Buffalo

248.5

279.0

273.9

174.2

67.3

50.9

20.5

Total milk

6507.0

7343.2

9614.9

9617.4

9794.0

8408.6

129.2

Source: FAO, FAOSTAT Data Base

Consumption Trends

Rapid grown in urbanization and real per capita income has led to a faster expansion of food demand than agricultural production and to shift in consumption patterns towards the livestock products, especially since 1980s. One of the consequences of this shift in consumer demand has been that the consumption share of some particular commodities from domestic resources has decreased over the last two decades (Anil 1995).

Turkey characterized by low animal fat and animal products consumption and high consumption of all types of plant products. Thus, it is worth stressing the decreasing trend in animal fat consumption experienced by Turkey. According to FAO Food Balance Sheets, Turkish people appeared to be well nourished (FAO 2004). The total protein consumption per capita was high, but maldistribution and the poor quality of the food consumed in Turkey were not properly demonstrated in Food Balance Sheets. The pattern of food consumption in Turkey for the period 1960-2002 is presented in Table 7.

Table 7. Per capita consumption of energy, protein and fat in Turkey (1960-2002)

Year

Total

Share of vegetal products

Share of animal products

Calories,
cal/day

Protein,
gr/day

Fat,
gr/day

Calories

Protein

Fat

Calories

Protein

Fat

1960

2881.3

90.8

67.7

84.3

72.2

55.5

15.7

27.8

44.5

1970

3017.1

90.5

70.2

86.2

73.4

60.7

13.8

26.6

39.3

1980

3281.3

95.6

83.9

87.0

73.0

67.1

13.0

27.0

32.9

1990

3539.2

102.4

88.0

89.0

75.6

71.5

11.0

24.4

28.5

2000

3371.8

96.4

91.9

89.3

75.0

74.6

10.7

25.0

25.4

2002

3357.0

95.4

91.6

90.5

77.7

77.3

  9.5

22.3

22.7

Change,%

16.5

5.1

35.3

7.4

7.5

39.2

-39.7

-19.6

-48.9

Source: FAO, FAOSTAT Data Base

Turkish food consumption patterns have changed dramatically in the last two decades. In 1960, the average daily calorie intake per person was 2881 Kcal, of which 15.7 percent was derived from animal products. These numbers for 2002 were 3357 and 9.5, respectively. The average daily protein intake per person in Turkey was 90.8 gram, of which 27.8 percent was derived from animal products in 1960. These numbers for 2002 were 95,4 and 22.3, respectively. The level of fat in Turkey's food supply increased from 67.7 grams per capita per day in 1960 to 91.6 grams in 2002. This 35.3% gain in fat reflects increased use of cooking oil and consumption of poultry and fish. Between 1960 and 2002, animal sources' share of total fat declined from 44.5 to 22.7 percent, while vegetable sources' share jumped from 55,5 to 77,3 percent.

The main differences existing between developed and developing countries lay in the animal calories out of total calories. Table 8 shows the evaluation of the calories, protein and fat from livestock production in Turkey, compared to developed and developing countries. As it can be observed, in developing countries there has been an increase in the amount of calories, protein and fat consumption together with the increase in the level of economic development.

Table 8. Per capita consumption of energy, protein and fat from livestock production(1960-2002)

Year

Turkey

Developed countries

Developing countries

Calories, cal/day

Protein, gr/day

Fat, gr/day

Calories, cal/day

Protein, gr/day

Fat, gr/day

Calories, cal/day

Protein, gr/day

Fat, gr/day

1960

452.8

25.2

30.1

767.8

43.0

57.3

136.4

8.6

9.6

1970

416.1

24.1

27.6

861.0

50.5

63.6

159.5

9.7

11.5

1980

426.8

25.8

27.6

914.4

55.5

67.8

200.1

11.8

14.7

1990

388.3

25.0

25.1

938.2

59.1

69.6

253.0

14.8

19.0

2000

361.1

24.1

23.3

858.7

55.6

61.8

349.1

20.6

26.4

2002

318.3

21.3

20.8

873.2

56.9

62.7

358.4

21.0

27.2

Change,%

-29.7

-15.5

-30.9

13.7

32.3

9.4

162.8

144.2

183.3

Source: FAO, FAOSTAT Data Base

Milk and beef are traditionally important in Turkish diet with high income elasticities of demand in all economic strata (Vaccaro 1995). Overall average consumption of red meat per capita remained fairly static between 1960-2000. Meat consumption has shifted over time from beef, veal, lamb, mutton, and goat to greater consumption of poultry and fish due to changing tastes and costs (Figure 1).

Figure 1. Per capita meat consumption in Turkey

Domestic beef consumption did not increase in recent years because of reduced animal supply, a high rate of inflation, increased beef prices, low incomes, and the BSE outbreak in Europe (Sarigedik 2003).

Per capita consumption of milk fell from 174.7 kg in 1960 to 98.1 kg in 2003 (Figure 2 and Table 9).

Figure 2. Per capita milk consumption in Turkey

Reasons for the downward trend of per capita milk consumption include increased population, decreased number of cows and sheep, and low productivity of animals. Beef, lamb and veal- accounted for 27.8% of the total meat consumption in 2003 compared with 31.8% in 1980 and 67.2% in 1960. Domestic consumption of poultry meat has grown most quickly, largely displacing traditional meats such as lamb, mutton and goat. Lower price of chicken meat against red meat increased its consumption in the domestic market. Poultry has also benefited from health-related concerns about beef. Chicken and turkey accounted for 10.6% of the total meat consumption in 2003 and 29.5% in 1960 (Table 9).

Table 9. Per capita consumption of livestock products (kg/year), 1960-2003

Year

Milk  

Red meat  

Fish  

Poultry  

Eggs  

Honey  

1960

174.74

14.24

4.71

2.25

1.94

0.28

1970

157.2

12.81

9.21

3.04

2.31

0.41

1980

167.32

9.32

14.01

5.99

3.87

0.54

1990

135.74

13.00

11.19

7.06

5.86

0.88

2000

117.11

10.75

14.13

8.80

8.88

0.85

2003

98.05

9.42

14.49

9.90

6.91

0.85

1960-1980

165.39

12.36

7.69

3.47

2.70

0.41

1980-2003

136.75

11.77

14.30

6.88

6.10

0.80

Change,%

-43.89

-33.85

307.64

440.00

356.19

303.57

Source: FAO, FAOSTAT Data Base

Total per capita meat consumption has increased from 21 kg in 1960 to 35 kg in 2003 even though red meat consumption has decreased from 14.24 kg in 1960 to 9.42 kg in 2003. Per capita egg consumption increase from 1.9 kg in 1960 to 8.9 kg in 2000, then decreased to 6.9 kg in 2003. Turkey per capita seafood consumption for 2003 is estimated at 14.5 kg up from 10 kg in 1960. Annual per capita consumption of honey increased from 0.28 kg in 1960 to 0.85 kg in 2003 (Table 9).

Demand for meat, in particular, outpaced domestic supply by a wide margin. Between 1960 and 2003, total meat consumption showed little growth, most of this being in poultry and fish. Per capita decreases in income and increases in relative meat prices were the main determinants of lower meat consumption. Due to the limited supply, beef and veal prices increased significantly in recent years. Income has the greatest influence on demand for livestock products, demand increasing with higher incomes up to a certain level, after which it tends to stabilize before it declines at the highest incomes. But there is unsatiated meat demand from the fast food sector (Sarıgedik 2003).

Decreased production will keep livestock product prices up and not allow lower-income groups access to such food. High prices decreased demand, total production and farm revenue because livestock products are both price and income elastic. In order to meet increased demand, Turkey should increase the quantities of animal products, particularly dairy products. Increased production and decreased prices may allow lower-income consumers to increase consumption of livestock products and help to decrease protein deficiency.


Conclusions and Recommendations


References

Anil S 1995: Food security by agricultural adjustment policies: The Turkish case. CIHEAM-Options Méditerranéennes Serie: A, No: 26.

Diaz-Briquests S, Cheny CC, and Germane S 1992: Nutrition CRSP feasibility and planning activity. Cassals and Associates: Arlington, USA.

FAO 2004: FAOSTAT Citation database results. FAO. http://faostat.fao.org/faostat

Karagoz A 2004: Country Pasture/Forage Resource profiles of Turkey. Grassland and Pasture Crops. FAO. http://www.fao.org/ag/AGP/AGPC/doc/Counprof/Turkey.htm

Koc A, Uzunlu V, and Bayaner A 2001: Turkish agricultural projection 2000-2010. Agricultural Economic Research Institute, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs. Ankara.

Sansoucy R, Jabbar MA, Ehui S and Fitzhugh H 1995: The contribution of livestock to food security and sustainable development. Proceedings of the Joint FAO/ILRI Roundtable on Livestock Development Strategies for Low Income Countries. International Livestock Research Institute, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

Sarigedik U 2003: Turkey Livestock and products Annual. USDA Foreign Agricultural Service GAIN Report.

SIS 2003: Statistical yearbook of Turkey, State Institution of Statistics, Turkey.

SIS 2002: Agricultural production value and prices, State Institution of Statistics, Turkey.

Togan S, Bayaner A and Nash J 2003: Analysis of the impact on agricultural markets and incomes of EU enlargement to Turkey. Conference on Turkey: Towards EU Accession. Ankara, May 10 -11.

Topuz F 2000: Turkiye'de hayvanciligin durumu ve fiyat disi destekleme uygulamalari, Ankara.

Vaccaro L 1995: Constraints and opportunities for livestock development in mixed farming systems in tropical Latin America and the Caribbean. Proceedings of the Joint FAO/ILRI Roundtable on Livestock Development Strategies for Low Income Countries. International Livestock Research Institute, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

Yurdakul O, Smith D, Koc A, Fuller F, Sengul H, Akdemir S, Oren N, Aksoy S, Yavuz F, Saner G, Akbay AA and Yalcin I 1999: Livestock supply and feed demand in Turkey: An evaluation of the current situation and alternative policy scenarios. Agricultural Economic Research Institute, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs. Ankara


Received 9 February 2005; Accepted 16 April 2005; Published 6 September 2005

Go to top